• Posts by Issue

  • Donate to CFS

  • NEW! Non-GMO Shoppers Guide App

  • Connect With Us

  • Get the Pig Picture

  • This website uses WPtouch and works with iPhone and iPod Touch

  • Archives

Other Hormones

With little regard for the cows or the humans that eventually eat them, the beef industry pumps growth hormones into upwards of 80 percent of beef cattle raised in the U.S. each year. These hormones are intended to boost growth rates and increase body mass–think cows on steroids. Although the U.S. Department of Agriculture does not allow producers to treat chickens or pigs with hormones, the agency does permit the practice for cattle and sheep. 

In addition to hormones used to increase milk production (see rbGH / rBST), there are six hormones approved for use in beef cattle. Two of these hormones, estradiol and zeranol, are likely to have negative human health effects, including cancer and impacts on child development, when their residues are present in meat. Concerns about these potential health impacts have left many scientists doubtful of the safety of hormone use in meat production.

The negative environmental impact of hormones entering waterways from livestock feedlots also is cause for alarm. Researchers have found that fish can exhibit significant effects from this pollution, e.g., females begin to exhibit male characteristics, and vice versa, in areas of high hormone concentrations.  

The European Union has criticized the use of hormones in meat production since the 1980s due to strong concerns about their safety. The EU prohibited the use of hormones for non-therapeutic purposes in 1985, and banned the importation of U.S. beef in 1988 to avoid importing hormone-treated meat. Since then, there has been a heated dispute between the United States and the EU over the ban, and, in a 1999 ruling, the World Trade Organization (WTO) decided in favor of the US. However, in April of that year, the EU’s Scientific Committee on Veterinary Measures relating to Public Health (SCVPH) released a report indicating that the use of the six growth hormones posed a risk to consumers. The EU ban remains in place.  

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

2 Responses

  1. I am a mother of two young boys, and we try and eat organic foods as much as possible.. My older son is seven, and we noticed a lump under his breast, doctor has said it is a breast bud, early puberty- at seven, this doesn’t seem right, I am concerned about hormones in meat products and if this has any connections. I am in human developmental classes right now, in college and seven is pretty early for this to happen, the doctor did not want to talk about nutrition and blew me off, saying we aren’t all the same and the range is much larger than books say. Any thoughts on this or am I just being overly protective, I don’t want to buy meat treated with hormones ever again.
    concerned parent,
    Amy Marias

  2. I don’t think you’re crazy at all. It can’t just be a coincidence any more. I was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2008 and I had bad eating habits. A lot of red meat consumption. I know I can’t know for sure that it was a contributing factor but why take a chance. If there is even the slimmest possiblitly that it could make you sick or enable a child to develop faster than is normal why allow it.

Leave a Reply