>>>Other Hormones
For over 10 years, rBGH (recombinant bovine growth hormone), also known as rBST (recombinant bovine somatotropin), has been a staple in the dairy products consumed by Americans. Since these products are not labeled as containing rBGH / rBST, most consumers have no idea that a growth hormone intended to induce dairy cows to be more productive is in much of their milk, cheese, and yogurt.
After approving the use of rBGH in 1993, the Food and Drug Administration has turned a deaf ear to the pleas of consumers, food safety organizations and scientists to reverse its approval of the hormone, or to simply require labeling of foods containing rBGH. Even a legal challenge by CFS could not force FDA to reexamine the health threats of rBGH. The FDA’s decision stood despite regulatory bodies in both Canada and Europe rejecting the hormone due to numerous animal and human health concerns.In cows treated with rBGH, significant health problems often develop, including a 50 percent increase in the risk of lameness (leg and hoof problems), over a 25 percent increase in the frequency of udder infections (mastitis), and serious animal reproductive problems, i.e., infertility, cystic ovaries, fetal loss and birth defects.
Because rBGH use results in more cases of mastitis, dairy farmers tend to use more antibiotics to combat the infections, the residues of which also may end up in milk and dairy products. These residues can cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals and contribute to the growth of antibiotic resistant bacteria, further undermining the efficacy of some antibiotics in fighting human infections.
Furthermore, recent research has shown conclusively that the levels of a hormone called “insulin-like growth factor-1″ (IFG-1) are elevated in dairy products produced from cows treated with rBGH. Canadian and European regulators have found that the FDA completely failed to consider a study that showed how the increased IGF-1 in rBGH milk could survive digestion and make its way into the intestines and blood stream of consumers. These findings are significant because numerous studies now demonstrate that IGF-1 is an important factor in the growth of cancers of the breast, prostate and colon.
CFS seeks to force the FDA to remove rBGH / rBST from the market through all available legal means. In 1999, CFS, joined by a number of other organizations, filed a legal petition with the FDA requesting that it remove from the market Monsanto’s rBGH / rBST (trade name Posilac). In late 2000, the FDA announced that it was denying that petition. CFS will continue applying legal pressure on this important food safety issue.
View a List of rbGH-Free Dairy Products
I have now been getting all of our milk from Oberweis dairy. While I believe it is only available in the US midwest, they do not use rGBH, and do not allow cloned animals. Their products are not labelled organic only because the cows are not given organic feed.
Thank you for your comment. Oberweis has informed us that they are rbgh-free, and completed our recent survey on cloning stating they will not use milk from clones or the offspring of clones. Yay! For folks outside of the midwest looking for rbgh-free dairy products, Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility has a good list, and other information here: http://www.psr.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Oregon_rBGHFactSheetsandDownloads. The list is a bit West Coast heavy (they are in Oregon, after all), but many of the brands are national. If you don’t see your local rbgh-free dairy products on the list, let us know what you purchase so we can improve it!
rBST is naturally produced by cows when they lactate. So even if you buy milk where they don’t inject the cows with rBST you are still ingesting it. Our bodies do not have the receptors necessary for it to have any effect on us.
Thank you for these wonderful and informative resources.